Another school of radicals does some imagining of its own. It envisages an international political monolith with which to replace America and indeed all of liberal democracy in the West. These yearnings are embodied in a doctrine called “transnational progressivism,” which is gaining prominence in law schools, for example, at Princeton and Rutgers. As John Fonte of the Hudson Institute points out, professors in this camp argue for the establishment of a new transnational regime, or world government, that is post-liberal democratic and, in the American context, post-Constitutional and post-American. Within such a regime the key political unit would not be the individual citizen who voluntarily associates with fellow citizens but the racial, ethnic, or gender group into which one is born.

1. There is no such thing as transnational progressivism.
2. There is no such place as Princeton Law School.
3. The nonexistent ideology of transnational progressivism is not being taught at Princeton’s nonexistent law school or any other (real or fictional) place.
4. The National Review is lying to you.