 |
||||||||
|
12/28/2002 11:50:00 AM | Karsten Barde The following comes from "People for the American Way," a church/state separation watchdog and otherwise sensible organization, in my book. http://www.pfaw.org Executive Orders By-Pass Congress, Permit Religious Groups to Discriminate Using Federal Funds Dec. 12, 2002 The White House today ordered federal agencies to allow religious groups that discriminate in hiring to receive federal tax dollars to operate social services. Before announcing his administration’s orders, President Bush criticized Sen. Trent Lott’s recent comments that the nation would be a much better place today if Strom Thurmond had won his 1948 presidential bid. Bush called Lott’s comments “offensive and wrong.” The president then declared that his administration is guided by principles of equal dignity and equal rights for every American. “President Bush says his policy is designed to put religious groups on an equal footing, but in fact he has created a special right for religious groups to discriminate using tax dollars, something other groups are forbidden from doing,” said Ralph G. Neas, president of People For the American Way. “Far from championing equal rights, the president is endorsing tax-funded discrimination.” Speaking in Philadelphia to a gathering of religious leaders, Bush signed executive orders that will ensure that religious institutions can receive federal tax dollars even if they refuse to hire employees because of their religious beliefs or lack thereof. Such an exemption from federal civil rights laws will not be available to non-religious charitable groups. Last year, the president failed to get his faith-based bill through Congress. Although the House passed the bill, the Senate could not muster enough votes, primarily because of the bill’s provisions allowing religious groups to discriminate in hiring. This morning in an NPR interview, the Director of the White House office of faith based initiatives Jim Towey said that religious groups that refuse to hire certain people, such as nonbelievers or gays, should not be barred from federal funds to operate social services. “The president’s words in support of equal rights for all Americans contrast sharply with his orders giving religious groups the ability to use tax dollars to discriminate against citizens who have different beliefs or no religious beliefs at all,” Neas said. “The president in fact has put the power of the federal government and our tax dollars behind discrimination.” perma link |
| 0 comments
0 Comments: |
Dartmouth The Free Press Alums for Social Change The Green Magazine The Dartmouth Dartmouth Observer Dartmouth Review Dartlog Inner Office The Little Green Blog Welton Chang's Blog Vox in Sox MN Publius (Matthew Martin) Netblitz Dartmouth Official News Other Blogs Ampersand Atrios Arts & Letters Altercation Body and Soul Blog For America Brad DeLong Brad Plumer CalPundit Campus Nonsense Clarksphere Crooked Timber Cursor Daily Kos Dean Nation Dan Drezner The Front Line Instapundit Interesting Times Is That Legal? Talking Points Memo Lady-Likely Lawrence Lessig Lean Left Left2Right Legal Theory Matthew Yglesias Ms. Musings MWO Nathan Newman New Republic's &c. Not Geniuses Ornicus Oxblog Pandagon Political State Report Political Theory Daily Review Queer Day Roger Ailes SCOTUS blog Talk Left TAPPED Tacitus This Modern World Tough Democrat Untelevised Volokh Conspiracy Washington Note X. & Overboard Magazines, Newspapers and Journals Boston Globe Ideas Boston Review Chronicle of Higher Education Common Dreams Dissent In These Times Mother Jones New York Review of Books New York Times Salon Slate The American Prospect The Nation The New Republic The Progressive Tikkun Tom Paine Village Voice Washington Monthly Capitol Hill Media ABC's The Note American Journalism Review Columbia Journalism Review CQ Daily Howler Donkey Rising The Hill Medianews National Journal NJ Hotline NJ Wake-up call NJ Early Bird NJ Weekly Political Wire Roll Call Spinsanity Search Search the DFP  |
|||||||
The opinions expressed here are not necessarily those of Dartmouth College or the Dartmouth Free Press.